subject
History, 01.05.2021 08:10 perezshayla56

"We pursued another of our major objectives: that of seeking means to lessen tensions with the Soviets and ways to prevent war and keep the peace. Now, this policy is now paying dividends—one sign of this in Iceland was the progress on the issue of arms control. For the first time in a long while, Soviet-American negotiations in the area of arms reductions are moving, and moving in the right direction—not just toward arms control, but toward arms reduction. … So, if there's one impression I carry away with me from these October talks, it is that, unlike the past, we're dealing now from a position of strength. And for that reason, we have it within our grasp to move speedily with the Soviets toward even more breakthroughs. … So, there's reason, good reason for hope. I saw evidence of this is in the progress we made in the talks with Mr. Gorbachev."—Ronald Reagan, from his "Address to the Nation on the Meetings with Soviet General Secretary Gorbachev in Iceland," October 13, 1986 How did meetings like this one affect the nature of American foreign relations? Many nations lost respect, seeing the meetings as a weakened resolve against Soviet power. They reinvigorated the U. S. commitment to staying out of rebellions against Communist rule. Many nations began seeking assistance with their own arms-reductions treaties and talks. They helped bring about an end to the Cold War and created new diplomatic relationships.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 13:00
This passage describes the legal principle of if two laws conflict with each other, the court must decide on the operation of [t]he constitution .. must govern the case to which they both apply. this principle says it is the court's job to decide if actions are allowed by
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
2. what was the dred scott decision about? what do we learn from this supreme court case?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:30
The civil rights act that passed in 1964
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
Will give brainliest and a will put up a free point questionthe following question refers to a hypothetical situation. the 2010 supreme court case, wagner v. tritch, involves the illegal distribution of copyrighted material to foreign consumers via the internet, which is a new area of law. the 9-0, unanimous vote on the court is set to overturn the lower appellate court decision that augustus tritch was liable for millions of dollars to the plaintiff, frederick von wagner, for illegally distributing his book to overseas customers. now that the court has voted on the case, explain what must happen next? describe the different types of opinions that could come from the court.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
"We pursued another of our major objectives: that of seeking means to lessen tensions with the Sovie...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 28.11.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 28.11.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 28.11.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 28.11.2021 01:10
question
English, 28.11.2021 01:10
question
History, 28.11.2021 01:10
Questions on the website: 13722367