Loyalist and Patriot views compare and contrast in many ways as their views on reconciliation, independent states, and the King of Great Britain differed. Loyalists were people who stayed loyal to the King during the 1700s whereas patriots were people who wanted independence from the King. These two view points differed in many events and were shared in speeches throughout the 1700s.
Reconciliation was a huge topic during the 1700s as loyalist believed that was the greatest option. For example William Smith, in document 6, expressed that reconciliation is better than trying to gain independence as it was in both countries mutual interests and safety. He explained that independence will further damage Great Britain and the colonies relationship and it would make the colonies life harder. In document 7, Charles Inglis made it clear that reconciliation would restore peace and the colonies could go back to their normal lives. However the patriots, such as the majority of the colony in Malden, Massachusetts, in document 1, believed that Great Britain did many wrong doings which could not be made up through peace.
The arguement of whether the colonies should be indepenent states was highly debated between the loyalists and the patriots. In document 4, loyalist Samuel Seabury shared that the colonies, if they became independent states, would dispute about many things causing them to go to war against each other. As he explained, it would “turn our arms on one another;—province against province,—and destruction and carnage would dessolate the land.” without a stable monarchy. Furthermore, patriots such as Thomas Paine, in document 5, wrote Common Sense to explain that staying connected to Great Britain would cause trade ruin in the colonies if Great Britain ever went to war with another country.
The view of the King of Great Britain can also be compared between the loyalist and the patriots as both sides thought differently on his influence within the colonies. In Document 3, John Dickinson shared that liberty under the English Monarchy was still enjoyable while England also supplied us with support in military arms and the pride of their name. He stated that the King would tear them apart due to him being so powerful. Whereas the patriots, expressed in document 1, believed that independence from the King would bring them closer to a well established country and they would not serve under any King any longer. Furthermore, patriot beliefs also included those that thought the King was being greedy and had ruined trade for the colonies with other countries many times.
In conclusion, loyalist and patriots expressed different views on reconciliation, independent states, and the King of Great Britain. Loyalist views were usually loyal to the King and supported Great Britian’s ideals. Whereas, patriot views were usually regarded to independence for the colonies and to be free from royal rule.
Explanation:
hope this helps :)
