Which action would most likely be protected under the First Amendment?

D.

Explanation:

The problem is, this seems to be a trick question, because both C. & D. can be correct. D. is the most probable, so I would choose that.

The First Amendment basically protects all speech unless you are inciting violence with intent to act on it.  When it comes to freedom of expression, in this case, protesting, the First Amendment protects your right to peaceably assemble. So if the protest is peaceful, then it is protected by the First Amendment. It is only when that protest becomes violent (or turns into a riot) when the First Amendment protection is suspended.

The reason why this is a trick question is because the First Amendment protects the right to peaceable assemble, but it does not specify if you can on public or private land. The general rule of thumb however is that these rights are to protect against government overreach. Protesting on land owned by a corporation is doing so on private property, and the owner of that land can request for the protesters to leave, and they must oblige or face a trespassing charge. Protesting on public land is allowed with a permit. So giving a public speech about government corruption would be the most correct choice here.

The exact wording of the First Amendment is attached below for reference:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

studies show tha in 7.5 billion years from now, the expanding sun will engulf, and destroy, the earth.

idk

explanation: