Write a critique of the two speeches given at the Berlin Wall by President Kennedy and President Reagan on which speech was more effective. You should address your critique to future world leaders. You will notice that although both speeches hope to change the thinking of the Eastern Bloc, each had a different approach. Within your critique, you need to propose a claim and counter claim that identifies the most effective speech. Make sure you support your ideas with key details from the speeches, as well as with facts. Your concluding statement should ask future leaders to include the techniques you found most favorable. Focus on the following questions to help you prepare your essay: What was Kennedy’s approach?
What was Reagan’s approach?
How are the speeches similar?
How are they different?
Which speech do you think was most effective? Why?
Why would other listeners disagree?

the right answer is the end of world war ii

after the end of a global wwii all the nations involved, in an attempt to create an organization to maintain world peace. this agreement would work settling international disputes via negotiation and arbitration instead of leading the issues escalate to another war.

not really sure i needed the points. sorry

probably that america is racist

the emancipation proclamation was the aim of the war change to include the freeing of slaves in addition to preserving the union. the 13th amendment, which abolished slavery in the u.s. was passed on december 6th 1865.

as promised, lincoln waited to unveil the proclamation until he could do so with success from the union military advance. on september 22nd 1862, after a victory at antietam, he publicly announced a preliminary emancipation proclamation, declaring all slaves free in the rebellious states as of january 1st 1863.