Do you believe it will be easier for law enforcement officers to apprehend criminals if they are not aware of fingerprinting? Why?​

Explanation:

This depends on who you mean by they. If by they you mean the criminals, then yes. This is because the criminals will most likely not use gloves and touch everything when performing the crime. This will allow law enforcement to clearly and quickly identify the individuals responsible and arrest them.

If by they you mean law enforcement then No. Fingerprinting is a crucial piece of crime scene investigation. It allows law enforcement to identify a specific individual that was at the scene of the crime. Since every single fingerprint is unique it is a vital piece of evidence in an investigation. Without it the officers would need lots more evidence and luck in order to prove that a specific individual was responsible for the crime.

frederick the great and the war of austrian succession. frederick william of brandenburg-prussia trained his son, frederick, to be a hardy soldier. he also declared himself king of bohemia, and maria theresa sent troops to retake bohemia. in august he led 80,000 of these men across the frontier into bohemia, his

for the 2 countries u can do china and america because america has a democratic government while china has a communist government.

a democracy is a government run by the people either by directly voting or indirectly by electing representatives. an oligarchy is a government run by a few or a small group of people. a democracy and oligarchy are similar because both in an oligarchy and an indirect democracy, a small group of induvial determine the laws for a large group of people they are different because in an oligarchy it is easier to control and they do not have to answer to a large number of people in the country, unlike a democracy where they do have to answer to a large number of people an county that is a democracy would be the united states. a country that is an oligarchy would be the china.