Why are primary sources considered more reliable?​

because primary sources are classified as first hand information not .first hand information is seen to be more reliable because it tends to have less fiction and more facts . it's first hand so I would mean I was made at that time or near it some of the writing on first hand information could be from someone who has had first hand experience with the situation . e.g : a man writes a letter about the war then another man comes along and dose the same but copies the other man's letter the primary one would be the first one .

the industrial revolution pushed the world into modern industrialization. it changed the course of history profoundly. it caused rapid urbanization and pushed cities and countries into development. the industrial revolution began in great britain with a series with new inventions which led to the creation of machines and mass production.

this caused the country to gain wealth and money and become an international superpower. it improved transportation and manufacturing inside the country, pushed people to live in urban areas and britain to become the most powerful nation in the world for a while.