Explain how the formation of the nation-state was both the triumph and tragedy of the post-colonial era

The definition of something like a nation-state is famously elusive. Among the most prominent historians of nation-states as well as democracy, Anthony Smith, concluded that what a country is a nation-state even so that when a specific ethnic and religious group resides within its borders, and the county's borders are congruent with the ethnic as well as cultural populace's borders.

   The expression "nation-state" means that the two are related in the sense that a state has elected to follow and support a particular cultural community. The federal state, metropolis, republic, confederacy, as well as other state structures in which it can intersect can be correlated and contrasting with the notion of a nation-state. The most important difference is the association of a group of individuals with a particular culture.

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.

maybe i can