subject
History, 25.05.2021 17:00 kitttimothy55

In the Mapp v. Ohio case, the Supreme Court ruled it illegal for courts to accept evidence that was taken without a warrant. The court's decision protects the rights of U. S. citizens by A. allowing wealthy citizens accused of a crime to stay in nicer jails.
B. taking away the government's right to confiscate illegal goods.
C. preventing the police from taking evidence whenever they want.
D. giving citizens time to call their lawyer after being arrested.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:00
The practice of selective incorporation means that the bill of rights will
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:30
The american civil war most former enslaved african americans in texas began making a living as
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:40
Select the five weaknesses of the articles of confederation. congress could not declare war or establish an army. congress could not levy taxes. congress could not control trade. not all the states were represented in congress. no national court system. no executive to enforce the laws. congress could not negotiate with foreign governments. the national government could not borrow money. nine of the states had to agree to pass a law.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
Where did people have to work with great organization to be successful at farming? a. on the yellow river basin c. on the hangzhou bay b. on the yangzi river basin d. on the hubei basin
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
In the Mapp v. Ohio case, the Supreme Court ruled it illegal for courts to accept evidence that was...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 27.09.2019 03:30
question
Mathematics, 27.09.2019 03:30
Questions on the website: 13722359