7. In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the Supreme Court ruled that the state of Maryland had no right to tax the Second Bank of the United States because the
federal government had established the bank. In a short essay, answer these
questions:
1. How do you think a Federalist would have responded to this ruling? How
would this person have justified his or her position?
2. How do you think an Anti-Federalist would have responded to this ruling?
How would this person have justified his or her position?
3. How has the debate regarding state and federal power continued to affect
U. S. Politics since this ruling? (10 points)

the correct option is: a liberal.

the kind of person that is most likely to hold a left-wing political ideology is liberal because they have in common that they support human individual rights and liberties. also, they both have politically and economically centrist.

moreover, a liberal believes that everyone should have equal rights as well as opportunities to succeed in life, and the freedom to make their own decisions as long as they don't attack the rights of other people. all people deserve the same opportunities and basic needs.

possible the invasion of room could have been avodiable but the people of rome were to stubboron and to wealthy the kingdoms saw them as a threat if they dialred it downa   bit ten i dont think they wouldnt failed   china was not iacvvdoaible they caused war to much and were out of hand therefor that must have happened india i dont really know it could of

1. the townshend acts of 1767 “threaten the country with poverty and ruin.”

at a town meeting held at faneuil hall in boston on october 28, 1767, boston freeholders and residents discussed the implications of the brutal townshend acts levied against the colonists. the townshend acts were a set of four acts passed by the british parliament in the summer of 1767 in order to generate revenue for the crown (through duties on goods such as lead, glass, paper, and tea) as well as exert british control over the increasingly rebellious colonists.

during the oct. 28 meeting, the bostonians found:

the excessive use of foreign superfluities is the chief cause of the present distressed state of this town, as it is thereby drained of its money: which misfortune is likely to be increased by means of the late additional burthens and impositions on the trade of the province, which threaten the country with poverty and ruin.

as a result, the citizens unanimously voted to boycott all british-made goods.