Historians refute counterclaims in argumentative essays in order to: A. include an argumentative thesis in an otherwise explanatory essay

B. introduce information into their essays that has not been corroborated

C. admit that their conclusions are incomplete and still require more research

D. demonstrate their awareness of theories that challenge their conclusions.​

I believe its D.

Explanation:

When you are arguing someone in an essay, it is good to show that you are aware of possible arguments that others will make towards your thesis.

julius caesar turned the roman republic into the roman empire by coming in and taking the "dictator" role during the time of a civil war (elites vs lower classes) winning battles and reputation, then declaring him dictator for life

hope this : )

frrr

explanation:

i am i want them to win against ohioo