Based on the scientific sources you found, did you think one person’s points were more scientifically valid than the other’s?

I don't know what the points are on but I think that people can all have valid points

Explanation:

answer:

won re-nomination with no opposition he also had the support of his party

explanation:

it saw incumbent president andrew jackson, candidate of the democratic party, defeat henry clay, candidate of the national republican party. jackson won re-nomination with no opposition, and the 1832 democratic national convention replaced vice president john c. calhoun with martin van buren.