Why might Hogarth’s painting in Source C be difficult for modern
audiences to understand? Does
this take away from his message?

Hi. You did not inform the painting that your question refers to, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, when searching for your question on the internet, I was able to find another question exactly like yours that showed the painting "Canvassing for Votes." If that's the case for you, I hope the answer below will help you.

"Canvassing for Votes" can be difficult for the modern public to understand, because it presents an electoral process that is different from what is currently carried out. This will prevent the public from associating the image presented in the painting with the image of a voting day today.

Explanation:

"Canvassing for Votes" is a critique of electoral corruption. In the painting we can see a political candidate distracting a crowd while his comrades offer money to a man who was about to vote. Money is being offered to convince the man to vote for the candidate.

It is currently not common to see candidates at polling stations, or party mates, or even crowds near the polling counter. Although we know that electoral corruption exists, it does not happen in the polling place, but it happens before, in a less public way.

The difference in how corruption happens today and how it happened in Hogarth's time may prevent the modern public from understanding the painting "Canvassing for Votes," without the aid of an explanation.

early human migrations are the earliest migrations and expansions of archaic and modern humans across continents and are believed to have begun approximately 2 million years ago with the out of africa migration of homo erectus. this initial migration was followed by other archaic humans including h. heidelbergensis, which lived around 500,000 years ago and was the likely ancestor of both denisovans and neanderthals. early hominids were said to have "crossed land bridges that were eventually covered in water" .

within africa, homo sapiens dispersed around the time of its speciation, roughly 300,000 years ago.the "recent african origin" paradigm suggests that the anatomically modern humans outside of africa descend from a population of homo sapiens migrating from east africa roughly 70,000 years ago and spreading along the southern coast of asia and to oceania before 50,000 years ago. modern humans spread across europe about 40,000 years ago.

the migrating modern human populations are known to have interbred with local varieties of archaic humans, so that contemporary human populations are descended in small part (below 10% contribution) from regional varieties of archaic humans.

after the last glacial maximum, north eurasian populations migrated to the americas about 20,000 years ago. northern eurasia was peopled after 12,000 years ago, in the beginning holocene. arctic canada and greenland were reached by the paleo-eskimo expansion around 4,000 years ago. finally, polynesia was peopled after 2,000 years ago, by the austronesian expansion.

its c