Texas recently passed a bill restricting how people can vote. Among the new restrictions is the banning of drive-through voting. This type of voting is used heavily by non "white" minorities. Do you think this is an effort to limit minorities from voting? Why or why not? HAS TO BE 5 SENTENCES

Answer and Explanation:

I do not consider the banning of drive-through voting as a way of limiting the vote of social minorities, but rather as a way of protecting the confidentiality of these people's votes and preventing cases of fraud or loss of votes. In this case, I believe that banning of drive-through voting is a way of enhancing the vote of social minorities that usually use this method of voting.

That's because drive-through voting takes place by placing ballots in voting boxes. These ballots contain people's votes, which take them to the boxes. This method of voting does not provide electoral security and for this reason it has been questioned and banned in many places, as a way to protect voters' citizenship and the democratic process.

hello!

according to the passage the most suitable options are two. the first one is "by leading the aef to victory in several key battles" like the battle of saint- mihiel and the battle of cantigny mentioned in the passage you copied here. the second one is "by the aef and allied forces defeat germany" since the passage says that his army destroy the german resistance in the meuse- argonne offensive. and also, "by insisting that the aef operate as an independent force".

hope this

she will pay the extra amount