How would the separation of church and state, as illustrated in the value of liberty for Tocqueville, contrast with countries with monarch rule at this time? -All monarchs embraced Catholicism and the US disavowed the religion altogether.
-Monarchs were chosen by “divine right” and the US did not have a monarch.
-Monarchial countries only allowed priests to run for office.
-Monarchial countries disavowed all religion.

there should be a waiting period

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

william mckinley

ulysses s. grant

benjamin harrison

by the way what grade r u in k12?

the lines on a surface map are called isobars. isobars are lines of constant pressure which are measured in units called millibars. the numbers indicate the amount of air pressure, in millibars, that each line represents.