How did the concept of nationalism contribute to the genocide of the Armenian people during World War I?
A. It gave the Ottoman Empire access to modern weapons that were
extremely deadly.
B. It made Ottoman leaders suspicious of groups that were not
Turkish or Muslim.
C. It resulted in the Ottoman Empire ruling over groups with different
ethnicities and religions.
D. It justified violence against any group perceived as unsupportive
of the Ottoman war effort.

Answer C

Explanation:

hey did it because the Ottoman Empire were suspicious of who wasn’t/ was Turkish or Muslim (something along those lines)

B. It made Ottoman leaders suspicious of groups that were not

Turkish or Muslim.

Explanation:

The Ottoman rulers, like most of their subjects, were Muslim. They permitted religious minorities like the Armenians to maintain some autonomy, but they also subjected Armenians, who they viewed as “infidels,” to unequal and unjust treatment. In spite of these obstacles, the Armenian community thrived under Ottoman rule. They tended to be better educated and wealthier than their Turkish neighbors, who in turn grew to resent their success. This resentment was compounded by suspicions that the Christian Armenians would be more loyal to Christian governments (that of the Russians, for example, who shared an unstable border with Turkey) than they were to the Ottoman caliphate.

deists, human beings can know god only via reason and the observation of nature, but not by revelation or by supernatural manifestations

hope this

answer: both considered peasants valued members of society.

explanation: the ancient chinese and indian empires were large asian empires that had the same problems with other big empires, they had to work hard and sometimes fight in order to keep them united, they both relied heavily on their capacity to trade and to send strange and rare items to europe, and had the father as the head of the house hold in both societies, but they didn´t considered pleasants as valued members of their society, they were the bottom of the social pyramid in both of their societies.