A historian is writing a paper on the idea of the divine right of kings in Europe during the Middle Ages. She reads a speech by a bishop in the Middle Ages claiming that kings were appointed by God to rule over people. She then explains why the bishop would have believed this idea, even if it is not one that most people believe today. What is she doing in this paper?

but whats the question? ?

explanation:

social contract theory basically says that all individuals are born equal, and provided a god given right to consent to be governed. american government is based of this

thomas hobbes and john locke said that we are selfish, individualistic, and constantly at war with each other, therefore we need to be controlled. 

government is defined as the legitimate use of force to control human behavior within territorial boundaries, here comes in hobbes and locke.

hobbes takes the part about controlling human behavior. while locke takes the part of legitimate use of force, since force is not legitimate unless there is consent of the people. 

there are basically 3 goals of the government: 1) maintain order by protecting life and property. 2) providing public goods, those which are typically not provided by the public sector, such as roads and education. 3) promote equality be it political, opportunist or outcome equality. 

the governor can not veto a referendum that the voters approve