Are civil war monuments truly about heritage? If so, then who's heritage and should that heritage be be celebrated?

Should monuments erected in public places remain for all time without regard for changes in society at large?

Monuments can be used for teaching lessons about the past, so is it better to achieve that by leaving them standing in public but with explanation or removed and placed elsewhere, such as a museum?

Which statement is true regarding the government structures of new france and the english colonies? a. new france was governed by the king, while some english colonies had authority to govern themselves. b. new france and the english colonies were established with the understanding that the king or queen would oversee all aspects of society. c. the english colonies were ruled by the king or queen who granted the charters, while new france had complete autonomy. d. both new france and the english colonies ruled without any interference from their country's respective king or queen.

For in this unit, you read about transitions of power and the formation of newly independent nations in africa, asia, the americas, and the middle east. some of these transitions were peaceful, while others caused long-term instability. why do you think some countries were more successful than others with political transitions? what do you think were the biggest challenges facing newly independent countries? would it have been possible for leaders to prevent these problems before they happened? why or why not?

Information in the 'news' category will always include opinions. true false