SOURCE 15
The peacemakers of 1919 made mistakes. of course. By their offnand treatment
of the non-European world they stirred up resentments for which the West is
still poying today. They took pains over the borders in Europe, even if they did
not drow them to everyone's satisfaction, but in Africa they comied on the old
practice of handing out territory to suit the imperialist powers. In the Middle East
they threw together peoples, in Iraq most notably, who still have not managed
to cohere into a civil society. If they could have done better, they certainly could
have done much worse. They tried, even cynical old Clemenceau, to build a
better order. They could not foresee the future and they certainly could not
control it. That was up to their successors. When wer came in 1939, it was a
result of twenty years of decisions token or not token, not of arrangements made
in 1919.
Historian Margaret MacMillan writing in Peacemakers, 2001

usually her father was the one that controlled it after the death of the husband

he risk-return relationship. generally, the higher the potential return of an investment, the higher the risk. there is no guarantee that you will actually get a higher return by accepting more risk. diversification enables you to reduce the risk of your portfolio without sacrificing potential returns.

explanation:

separation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another.   the intent is to prevent the concentration of power and provide for checks and balances.  

the traditional characterizations of the powers of the branches of american government are:

* the legislative branch is responsible for enacting the laws of the state and appropriating the money necessary to operate the government.

* the executive branch is responsible for implementing and administering the public policy enacted and funded by the legislative branch.

* the judicial branch is responsible for interpreting the constitution and laws and applying their interpretations to controversies brought before it.

forty state constitutions specify that government be divided into three branches:   legislative, executive and judicial.   california illustrates this approach; "the powers of state government are legislative, executive, and judicial.   persons charged with the exercise of one power may not exercise either of the others except as permitted by this constitution."

while separation of powers is key to the workings of american government, no democratic system exists with an absolute separation of powers or an absolute lack of separation of powers. governmental powers and responsibilities intentionally overlap; they are too complex and interrelated to be neatly compartmentalized. as a result, there is an inherent measure of competition and conflict

minnesota:   minnesota house research,   separation of powers: when statutes and court rules conflict, 2005

comparison is that they aren't nationalistic. a dif is that sds is government approved movemnet while yaf isnt \

it isnt that hard

explanation: