How did geographic conditions shape these civilizations? Write an essay in which you consider the benefits and the challenges of geography for the Mesopotamian and Egyptian empires

The benefits and the challenges of geography for the Mesopotamian and Egyptian empires are that they had their personal river valleys, which were essential for them.

Both lived close to the Mediterranean sea, the Persian Gulf, and the Red sea: perfect for trading. Egypt is surrounded by desert and sea, making it protected with natural walls.

Mesopotamia is alike in that, it's connected by desert to the east and south, mountains to the north, and sea to the west.

Mesopotamia had the Tigris River and the Euphrates River as their water system while Egypt has the Nile River.

The rivers are essential to these two areas. They both flood annually, providing some guarantee of grain and water and provides a way for the civilizations to transport goods.

Both were close to the Mediterranean sea, Persian gulf, and red sea - ideal trading opportunities.

Explanation:

hope it helps po

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

it for the workers lik if you have a job thats what its for

explanation: