Why is it important for historians to check the validity of a historical account, before using its details in their own writing? A. lPeople tend to record details of the event as quickly as possible after the event occurs.
B. People who write historical documents usually lack education or haven't been trained.
C. People often find reasons to record history in a way that Ignores or changes facts.
D. None of the above

C. People often find reasons to record history in a way that ignores or changes facts.

Explanation:

This makes it important to check if a historical account is valid so historians know the information they are viewing is correct.

both are true, the congress does have the power to create banks, even if this power is not specifically described in the constitution, since there is nothing restricting it and there is power given to the congress to make "all laws which shall be necessary and proper". maryland was not allowed to tax a branch of the national bank operating there, and the supreme court decided that no state could. both of these topics were discussed in a decision of the mcculloch v. maryland case in 1819.

most are appointed by the president and confirmed by a vote in the senate. however, appeals court judges appoint federal bankruptcy judges, and district judges appoint federal magistrate judges. the qualifications for these positions vary depending on the preferences of the person reviewing nominees.

hope this , give me brainliest answer = )