subject
History, 26.09.2021 14:00 juniorracer148

"The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic."
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
Which interpretation of the Bill of Rights does this statement illustrate?
Individual rights are absolute.
Individual rights are not absolute.
The rights of the majority overrule the rights of the minority.
The needs of the government are more important than the individual.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 12:30
Which sequence of event best describes the role of textile manufacturing in initialing industrialization?
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 14:30
What was the primary concern for the missouri statehood question
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
How does the existence of a site like catus hill demonstrate the challenge that archaeologist face when making theories?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Hich answer supports the statement, "the state constitution is more detailed than the u.s. constitution"? a) the u.s. constitution was created after state constitutions had been established. b) the u.s. constitution only exists because the state constitutions allowed it to be created. c) the articles in the state constitution do not deal with amendments like the u.s. constitution does. d) the articles in the state constitution deal with more specific issues than does the u.s. constitution.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
"The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in...
Questions
question
English, 24.12.2019 17:31
question
Mathematics, 24.12.2019 17:31
Questions on the website: 13722360