subject
History, 30.09.2021 18:50 msalecora

Social scientists argue that a system-blame approach to social problems is important because social structures and institutions are often at least partially to blame for social conditions. Do you agree or disagree that the system-blame approach is important? Do you feel that the person-blame or the system-blame approach does a better job of explaining social problems?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:50
How did charles v and philip ii expand the spanish state? they united separate spanish kingdoms into a unified state. they supported protestant rebels in the netherlands. they carried on a successful war against britain. they fought wars and tried to expand catholicism.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 19:00
Why is it useful for historians to base certain studies on the analysis of historical periods
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
The difference between ptolemy iii and ptolemy xiv
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:30
John locke believed there was a social contract between a govemment and its people. what were the details of this contract?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Social scientists argue that a system-blame approach to social problems is important because social...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722359