how would an antiquarian interpret the site differently from a culture historian? How would these differ from processual or post-processual interpretations?

Post-processual archaeology, which is sometimes alternately referred to as the interpretative archaeologies by its adherents, is a movement in archaeological theory that emphasizes the subjectivity of archaeological interpretations. Despite having a vague series of similarities, post-processualism consists of "very diverse strands of thought coalesced into a loose cluster of traditions". Within the post-processualist movement, a wide variety of theoretical viewpoints have been embraced, including structuralism and Neo-Marxism, as have a variety of different archaeological techniques, such as phenomenology.

Explanation:

pls give brainliest

might be agreeing to participate ethically with other european nations in the slave trade

or notifying other european nations when taking possession   of african territories