subject
History, 17.10.2021 01:40 reyne36

A) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Shaw v. Reno and Easley v. Cromartie. b) Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts elucidated in Easley v. Cromartie might have led to a different holding than the holding in Shaw v. Reno (Hint: think politics in Easly and race in Shaw as predominant factors in drawing district lines and violation of the Equal Protection clause).

c) Describe an action that members of the public who disagree with the holding in Easley v. Cromartie could take to limit its impact (hint: if you think there was a racial focus, what could you do to limit the impact of the decision? protest, campaign contributions, voting, elections, support interest groups, political parties, public media campaign, lawsuits, new SC justices, constitutional amendment for redistricting, etc)

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 13:00
Lee's campaign to invade maryland was stopped after his defeat at the battle of: a. seven pines b. williamsburg c. antietam d. none of these
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:00
Brainliesttt asap!me : ) answer in your own words. what was the relationship between medieval theories about scientific reasoning and the kind of reasoning favored during the scientific revolution?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
What country was the philippines declaring independence from in this proclamation?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:40
The source of wealth for the city-states of the east african coast was trade between the interior of africa and the far east. true false
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
A) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Shaw v. Reno and Easley v. Cromartie....
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.11.2020 17:00
question
Mathematics, 05.11.2020 17:00
Questions on the website: 13722363