subject
History, 25.10.2021 06:10 abbasaliza01

Book II - || "Theft" - Suppose someone opens or breaks into something too heavy to be moved. He is not responsible to an action of theft for the whole thing but only for
those things which he actually stole, because he cannot take the whole. Similarly, if
anyone opens a case of things which he cannot carry away in order to meddle with
the contents and he does meddle with them then even though he could manage to
take away several of the individual things, he is only a thief of the particular things he
takes and not of the whole if he cannot carry away the whole amount. However, if he
was capable of carrying away the whole container we say that he is a thief of the
whole amount, whether or not he opened it to take away the contents.
Review the third excerpt on theft. Besides the basic problem of theft, what problems
does this law attempt to solve? Do we have a similar approach to theft in the United
States today? Why or why not?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
What does the document of the birtish octopus is an uderlying cause of the world war 1
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:30
There are no written records of the first migration of humans to the americas? true or false
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
What are three supporting points as to why opium was wrong in the chinese trade? why should it have stopped? (opium wars)
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
Enforces the laws.a.legislativeb.executivec.judicial
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Book II - || "Theft" - Suppose someone opens or breaks into something too heavy to be moved. He is...
Questions
question
English, 21.06.2019 17:30
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:30
Questions on the website: 13722363