In determining if a law or action is legal or not, the Supreme Court always refers back to the Constitution. Is it wise to refer back to a single document when interpreting modern law? What would happen if the courts referred to no document of laws or principles

answer; ///south carolina is the correct answer;

answer; i believe the correct answer is benjamin harrison;

roosevelt, a progressive reformer, earned a reputation as a "trust buster" through his regulatory reforms and anti-trust prosecutions. his "square deal" included regulation of railroad rates and pure foods and drugs; he saw it as a fair deal for both the average citizen and the businessmen.

the eop relieves the president of the duty of serving as commander in chief. the also eop reduces the president's ability to appoint staff and advisers.

hope this ! : )