An American city has a high crime rate. A citizen of that city wants to own a firearm so he can protect his property. The city does not allow residents to own certain types of firearms. The citizen files suit, claiming that his right to own a firearm is protected by the Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court rules in favor of the citizen and strikes down the city’s ban on certain types of firearms. In which of the following ways is the outcome of the scenario explained by the doctrine of selective incorporation?

- The city was unable to ban firearms because it lacked the power of a state.
- The Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment is enforceable upon the states.
- The citizen was successful because he argued that the city was discriminating against him.
- The federal statutes on firearms took precedence over stricter state and city laws that limited ownership.

Examine the dates in this timeline: • 1918: the ottoman empire loses control of iraq to the britishfollowing world war i.• 1932: the kingdom of iraq is granted its independence from greatbritain• 1945: mustafa barzani leads a failed rebellion against the iraqigovernment• 1948: the al-wathbah uprising results in protests against the iraqigovernment before it is violently suppressed.• 1958: the kingdom of iraq is overthrown by military leaders whoestablish the republic of iraq,• 1980: iraq invades iran, launching the iran iraq war.• 1990: iraq invades kuwait but is defeated by united nations forcesled by the united states.• 2003: the united states and its allies invade iraq and remove itsdictator, saddam hussein.which title would best suit the period in iraqi history from 1980 through1990? a. the era of political instability and protestb. the era of american involvementc. the era of iraqi aggressiond. the era of early iraqi independence