I need help with this! I will give brainliest Following the Civil War, the South was in ruins; cities had been burned to the ground, a fourth of the men had died in the war, and the end of slavery meant changing the way cotton, tobacco, and other crops were produced and harvested. President Lincoln and Congress had a difficult task ahead: how best to balance punishing the former Confederacy and its supporters while repairing the Union into a single, unified country once more.

As mentioned in the Unit and your United States History and Geography textbook, several different proposals were made regarding how to reconstruct the South. These included President Lincoln's plan, the Radical Republicans' plan, and the final Reconstruction plan passed by Congress. In a five paragraph essay, compare (find similarities) and contrast (find differences) two of these plans and discuss which plan you think was best or what changes you would have made.

In your first paragraph, discuss the similarities between the two plans you chose.

In your second paragraph, discuss the differences between the two plans you chose.

In the third paragraph, explain which plan you think was superior and explain why.

Discuss any changes you would have made to the plan; how could you improve it?

the civil war was a fulfillment and completion of the constitution, not a revolution against it. changes in culture and society surely affected political life. lincoln hoped to bring the north and south together after the war by healing the nationand making people lose their resentment.

hope this you out just took thus test a min go and mad a 100

although world war i began in 1914, the united states did not join the war until 1917. the additional firepower, resources, and soldiers of the u.s. to tip the balance of the war in favor of the allies. remaining neutral. when war broke out in 1914, the united states had a policy of neutrality.

the fundamental orders of connecticut it would be the letter b

imperialism and colonization in 1936

part of the politics series

basic forms of government

power structure

separation

associated state dominion chiefdom

federalism

federation confederation devolution

integration

empire hegemony unitary state

administrative division

power source

democracy

power of many

direct representative liberal social demarchy others

oligarchy

power of few

anocracy aristocracy plutocracy kakistocracy kraterocracy stratocracy timocracy meritocracy technocracy geniocracy noocracy kritarchy particracy ergatocracy netocracy

autocracy

power of one

despotism dictatorship military dictatorship

others

anarchy theocracy

power ideology

monarchy vs. republic

socio-political ideologies

absolute legalist

constitutional

parliamentary directorial semi-presidential presidential

authoritarian vs. libertarian

socio-economic ideologies

tribalism despotism feudalism colonialism distributism anarchism socialism communism totalitarianism

global vs. local

geo-cultural ideologies

commune city-state national government intergovernmental organisation world government

politics portal

vte

an empire is a sovereign state functioning as an aggregate of nations or people that are ruled over by an emperor or another kind of monarch. the territory and population of an empire is commonly of greater extent than the one of a kingdom.[1]

an empire can be made solely of contiguous territories, such as the austro-hungarian empire or the russian empire, or of territories far remote from the homeland, such as a colonial empire. aside from the more formal usage, the word empire can also refer colloquially to a large-scale business enterprise (e.g. a transnational corporation), a political organisation controlled by a single individual (a political boss), or a group (political bosses).[2] the word empire is associated with such other words as imperialism, colonialism, and globalization. empire is often used to describe a displeasure to overpowering situations.[3]