subject
History, 10.12.2021 20:20 2sally2

The principal-agent relationship between a group of voters and their representative can sometimes be imperfect. More to the point, a representative could decide to go against the wishes of voters on a regular basis. Why is this an inherent risk of the relationship?

The interests of the agent and the principal may not be well aligned.

Principals can force agents to do things against their will so much that the agents rebel.

Agents and principals in this relationship can both be irrational at times.

Voters are often ignorant about the ins and outs of major issues, giving representatives the moral duty to decide for them.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
Concentration camps built by nazis in 1933 initially held
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:10
What is a shocking irony about the villagers in the lottery
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 13:30
Which of these would be most useful in studying the effect of germs exchanged between the new and old worlds? a. a graph showing the number of europeans between 1492 and 1600. b. a graph showing the number of native americans between 1492 and 1600. c. a primary source description of the symptoms of an unknown disease affecting native americans in 1492. o d. a primary source description of the symptoms of an unknown disease affecting europeans in 1492.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 13:40
Under the dominion of new england, american colonists? ?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The principal-agent relationship between a group of voters and their representative can sometimes be...
Questions
question
English, 24.07.2019 11:30
Questions on the website: 13722362