Based on this module's concepts and the context of climate change and sea-level rise, how could a person reasonably justify a ban on buying properties with high-risk of flooding? a. Nozickians would justify the banning of buying high-risk properties if it could be proved that real state brokers manipulate the sales and mislead buyers about their odds of flooding in these properties.
b. Rawlsians would justify the banning of buying high-risk properties because mostly poor people will buy them. Thus, buying these properties redistributes money from the poor to the rich, making society's least advantaged group even worse off.
c. Utilitarians would justify the banning of buying high-risk properties because mostly poor people buy them. Thus, buying these properties redistributes money from the poor, who have high marginal utilities of money, to the rich, who have lower marginal utilities of money.
d. All of the other answers are true.

freedom of speech is also protected by the 1 amendment.

explanation:

here is pretty much what the 1st amendment says:

congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

hi! i'd love to assist you with this however the chart is not attached to your question. could you share the attachment with me? !

the map that was shown mostly had eastern asia highlighted. the answer would mostly likely be "the spread of communism into eastern asia set the stage for the korean war."

hopefully this .

attacks by the seljuk. a devastating blow to the entire byzantine world was dealt by christian crusaders from the west. the venetians were eager to destroy byzantine power and offered the crusaders money, ships, and part of the spoils of war.

read more on -