Today, many take it for granted that there is a president in the United States, along with two houses of Congress. When the Constitution was being written, none of this was certain. Take a moment to imagine: how could the US. Constitution have been different?

Important Cases. The second clause of Article II Section 2, the Advice and Consent Clause, contains two separate Presidential powers – both requiring the consent of the Senate. The Treaty Clause allows the President to negotiate and enter into agreements with foreign countries upon the approval of the Senate.

it could have been different because the power is shared between the people,the president,and the two houses of congress and back then many people feared monarcy so they tried to share everything equally  so it might have been diffrent because the president would have been more like a king because the two houses are not there.

Explanation:

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

i'm pretty sure the answer would be

c. england

hope this best of luck sorry if i'm wrong

~animaljamissofab ♥