List 2-3 ways that Spence’s account compares or contrasts with the Japanese textbook.

Hope it helps :)

Explanation:

According to Spence, the Japanese troops unleashed on the defeated Chinese troops and harmed the civilians.

The Japanese troops entered the city on the thirteenth of December and harmed and unleashed on the Chinese troops which was the defeated troops. After entering the city, they harmed and troubled the civilians also including the females.

The female assault exploited people, a large number of whom  kicked the bucket after rehashed attacks, were evaluated by outside eyewitnesses  living in Nanjing at 20,000; the criminal troopers slaughtered were evaluated   at 30,000; killed regular citizens at 12,000. Other contemporary Chinese  gauges were as much as multiple times higher (300,000) and it is  hard to set up precise figures. Unquestionably burglary, wanton   pulverization, and fire related crime left a significant part of the city in ruins.

it is the dominance of   the spanish language and roman catholic region in mexico, french being the official language of several african countries, and the existence of a western-style government in south asian countries