How did the Bible disprove the attacks by its enemies? Use complete sentences.

Although we can never actually prove the Bible to be spiritually correct, we can seek to divert these attacks by pointing to prophecies in the Bible. If prophecies can be shown to be true, then the Bible must have been inspired by God. The rub is that believers accept the prophecies to be true, but time and again sceptics point to reasons to doubt the very fact of those prophecies.

Brainliest pls

Explanation:

However long the adversaries of The Bible acknowledge the reality of the Bible, it is somewhat simple to turn around assaults on the Bible essentially by citing part and refrain to demonstrate the Bible right. A few pundits, albeit not really foes of the Bible, portray this as roundabout thinking since it depends on the Bible to be right, to demonstrate it to be right. One reaction to this is to take scriptural sections that are affirmed by non-scriptural sources and utilize this proof to demonstrate the whole Bible right and entirely inerrant. Tragically, a few pundits persevere and say that nobody at any point asserted the Bible is never generally right, simply that it isn't generally so and besides that, there is no proof that it is in a profound way right.

Despite the fact that we can never really show the Bible to be in a profound way right, we can try to redirect these assaults by highlighting predictions in the Bible. On the off chance that predictions can be demonstrated to be valid, the Bible has probably been roused by God. The rub is that devotees acknowledge the predictions to be valid, however over and over cynics highlight motivations to uncertainty the actual truth of those predictions.

Eventually, we can involve the Bible and confidence to negate scriptural analysis as far as we could tell, however, we can never truly invalidate these assaults in the personalities of a very much informed pundit.

30 and 44 are b

explanation:

d is the correct answer

~courtney