What was Thomas B. Wait’s view of the necessity for a Bill of Rights ?

Consequently, a bill of rights was not necessary and was perhaps a dangerous proposition. It was unnecessary because the new federal government could in no way endanger the freedoms of the press or religion since it was not granted any authority to regulate either. Rights omitted could be considered as not retained.

Explanation:

Reviewing the draft, Wait wrote, “Now, how absurd—how grosly absurd is all this, if Congress, in reality, have no powers but those particularly specified in the Constitution!” He continued: “It will not do, my friend—for God’s sake let us not deny self-evidence propositions—let us not sacrifice the truth, that we may establish a favourite hypothesis;—in the present case, the liberties and happiness of a world may also be sacrificed.” “There is a certain darkness, duplicity and studied ambiguity of expression running thro’ the whole Constitution which renders a Bill of Rights peculiarly necessary.—As it now stands but very few individuals do, or ever will understand it.”

Explanation:

the real answer is b

i think iowa because you committed the crime there