Do you agree or disagree with the supreme court’s majority ruling in yarborough v. alvarado? write a short paragraph describing your answer and connect the case to the miranda v. arizona decision.

No, the Supreme Court’s majority ruling should not be accepted.

Alvarado who was a minor and under police custody was stated not official by the state's court. However, the Supreme court overturned this order and said that the minor was arrested by the police for interviewing Miranda's case.

However, the minor believed that he was in custody and would have confessed under pressure. Hence, Miranda rights give permission to suspect to be silent if suspected by the police.

It is similar to Miranda v. Arizona as there also perpetrator was not considered official in the police custody when the records of confession stated.

Therefore, made the court reject the order that the detained minor is a criminal as no attorney rights were provided before the police investigation.

Learn more about Yarborough v.Alvarado here:

link

these the citzens and goverment come to terms some of the amendments gave the states more power then the goverment and some protocted americans rights

explanation:

japan participated in world war i from 1914 to 1918 in an alliance with entente powers and played an important role in securing the sea lanes in the west pacific and indian oceans against the imperial german navy as the member of the allies.