What are the major arguments against judicial review?

Judicial Review is controversial as it has the power to change the laws without the states or federal powers validation.  

The major arguments against it are: first, the power of judicial review is not established explicitly in the constitution.  

The second is that only the states alone are the only ones to have the power to change the law.

could you give me the options ?

most are appointed by the president and confirmed by a vote in the senate. however, appeals court judges appoint federal bankruptcy judges, and district judges appoint federal magistrate judges. the qualifications for these positions vary depending on the preferences of the person reviewing nominees.

hope this , give me brainliest answer = )