subject
History, 14.07.2019 12:50 batpool3375

The constitution was to be considered in effect as soon as it was ratified by

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:20
How are the republican and democratic presidential candidates chosen? a. they are nominated by their state governments. b. each is nominated by his or her respective party. c. each is chosen by the governor of his or her home state. d. they are chosen by the house of representatives.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:00
Which effect did the united states supreme court's decision in plessy v. ferguson have? 1. ending segregation in all public schools in america 2. protecting voting rights for african americans by eliminating literacy tests 3. upholding the rights of all citizens to be treated equally by the government 4. authorizing the system that kept black and white people separated
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:00
Where did the term β€œiron curtain” originate? the warsaw pact used the term iron curtain as a code word for communism. in a 1946 speech, british prime minister winston churchill said an iron curtain had fallen across the continent of europe. while visiting western europe in 1946, u.s. president harry truman commented that the mountains there looked like iron curtains. russian general secretary joseph stalin instructed citizens of eastern europe to hang iron curtains over their windows to protect themselves from stray bullets.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The constitution was to be considered in effect as soon as it was ratified by...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 31.01.2022 01:00
question
Social Studies, 31.01.2022 01:00
question
Mathematics, 31.01.2022 01:00
question
Mathematics, 31.01.2022 01:00
question
Mathematics, 31.01.2022 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722360