History, 20.07.2019 22:20 nay191

How does the international court of justice (icj) receive state consent to its jurisdiction?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

The International Court of Justice has jurisdiction in two types of cases: contentious cases between states in which the court produces binding rulings between states that agree, or have previously agreed, to submit to the ruling of the court; and advisory opinions, which provide reasoned, but non-binding, rulings on properly submitted questions of international law, usually at the request of the United Nations General Assembly. Advisory opinions do not have to concern particular controversies between states, though they often do.

Answer from: july00

If you of searched it on google this would be the correct answer good luck!!!
The International Court of Justice has jurisdiction in two types of cases: contentious cases between states in which the court produces binding rulings between states that agree, or have previously agreed, to submit to the ruling of thecourt; and advisory opinions, which provide reasoned, but non-binding, rulings on ...

Answer from: Quest

1) the answer is b

senators serve a six-year term; representatives serve a two-year term, making them more responsive to (and responsible for) voter confidence.

2) the answer is d

to serve as president, one must: -be a natural-born u.s. citizen of the united states; be at least thirty-five years old; be a resident in the united states for at least fourteen years.

3) the answer is a

ella,because it is constitutionally eligible

4) the answer is c: the u.s president

Answer from: Quest

unbeknownst to the slave-ship captains, the daily dancing and exercise regime and vernacular dance are also derived from america's african-based slave legacy. both are african-american cuisines from the slavery era.

explanation:

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 13:30

What were major causes of the dust bowl apex

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 01:00

Which of the following arguments decided the debate over using the atomic bomb against japan in 1945? using the bomb would destroy the armaments still available to japanese forces in japan. using the bomb would demonstrate the power of the united states to the entire world. using the bomb would shorten the war and avoid heavy casualties among invading troops. using the bomb would enable allied forces to invade and take over the japanese mainland

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 05:00

Why did french and austrian troops stops revolts in spain and italy

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 05:30