In what way was colonial reaction to the stamp act, the townshend acts, and the tea act similar? the colonists no longer bought any british goods. the colonists boycotted british goods. the colonists dumped goods into boston harbor. the colonists refused to house british soldiers.

The colonists boycotted British goods.

Explanation:

The Seal Law, Stamp Act or Stamp Act was a law of the British Parliament that involved a direct and specific tax for the thirteen colonies of British America that required that most printed materials in the colonies be published on stamped paper and produced in London, stamped with a raised tax stamp. The Townshend Laws was one of a series of taxes that divided Britain and its colonies in America. Unlike the Stamp Act of 1765, the laws were not a direct tax, but a tax on imports. The Stamp Act had been repealed by the opposition in the colonies that include the boycott of British products. The Townshend Laws of 1767 were the idea of ​​Charles Townshend, who was one of the ministers of William Pitt and his Chatham ministry. Charles Townshend, as Minister of Finance, had the difficult role in the British government of finance management. Tea Act was a law promulgated by the Parliament of the Kingdom of Great Britain in May 1773 that allowed the British East India Company to sell its tea in the Thirteen Colonies of North America without paying taxes. The law was enacted to try to relaunch the Company, which was in a serious crisis, giving it a monopolistic place in British commerce. As a result, a boycott of British tea by the colonists of the Thirteen Colonies began, culminating in the Boston Tea Party.

Contributing factors  leading  to the harlem renaissance were the great migration of african americans to northern cities, which concentratedambitious  people in places where they could encourage each  other, and the first world war, which had created new industrial work opportunities for tens of thousands of people.