The case of pinkerton v. u. s. (1946) deals with what rule

The brothers Walter and Daniel Pinkerton were accused of violations of the Internal Revenue Code, and while Walter Pinkerton was charged with conspiracy and 9 other crimes, his brother Daniel appealed to say that only his brother had conspired, and he had been unjustly accused of conspiracy (only had 6 substantial crimes). It was said in the CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS - FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT in the Syllabus: That when someone is accused of conspiracy, and also has other crimes, the crimes are not added to the conspiracy and are judged separately. After much deliberation and analysis of other cases, finally, the Court decided that when the accused are united in a conspiracy, the substantive crimes they committed, to achieve that conspiracy, can be added to all the accused, only if they were all accused. part of the conspiracy, when they committed the added crimes.

Protecting and assisting  u.s. citizens  living or traveling abroad; assisting u.s.  businesses  in the international marketplace; coordinating and providing support for international activities of other u.s. agencies (local, state, or federal government), official visits overseas and at home, and other diplomatic efforts.keeping the public informed about u.s. foreign policy and relations with other countries and providing feedback from the public to administration officials.providing  automobile registration  for non-diplomatic staff vehicles and the vehicles of diplomats of foreign countries having  diplomatic immunity  in the united states

1is that it separated familys