History, 23.07.2019 00:40 homeschool0123

Which statement does not describe a cultural change that occurred in the 1920s

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: lxlie2315

Law-Abiding citizens intentionally supported organized crime by drinking illegal liquor.

Answer from: Quest

- "schenck v. united states, case in which the u.s. supreme court ruled on march 3, 1919, that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the u.s. constitution's first amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a “clear and present danger.” "

- speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned.

< 3

Answer from: Quest

congress seems to have some powers the states do not have. they can do some pretty big things, they can declare war. and they can lead armies and navies. they also have the power to create a mail delivery system, make foreign treaties, print and borrow money, (both states and congress can do that)and make rules for certain places, i think they said the western states.

the new government has been a big to growing their country! they are getting new land over west. and they are passing laws which to settle boundary issues.

although most of this information sounds good for them, bad for us, there are some weaknesses from their plan. the people are still having issues with taxes and trading goods, they also don't have a main leader such as a chief or a president. they also have trouble with currency. the states are printing out so much money the national currency is beginning to be worthless. so things are getting hard to handle over here.

some of the americans like the new government and think that even if they could ask about changing it they would be ignored. daniel shays got a group of people who hated the new government and decided to attack. this could become either worse or better.

(one-paragraph analysis)

i think that they may start a war or some sort of big attack to make them change their government. most americans just don't want to discuss it. but i think that daniel man will speak up for them. if they do scare them they will get a better government and be able to deal with their issues better! i think that is what is going to happen next in the u.s., sincerely

lorelei hope this i had some from the internet u can report me if u want

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 16:00

Five nations with a multiparty system of government.conduct a brief search of secondary source to find a answer

Answers: 3

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 17:00

Although the three-fifths compromise northern and southern states reach an agreement that allowed for ratification of the constitution, in the long run it had a negative effect on the nation because a) it gave too much power to the executive branch of the government. b) it forced the founding fathers to add the bill of rights to the constitution. c) it was only a temporary solution to the argument between "free" and "slave" states. d) it gave too much power to state governments and not enough to the federal government.

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 19:40

Considering the benefits and drawbacks of the different types of money as well as the gold standard, do you agree or disagree with the us government’s decision to discontinue the gold standard? justify your response.

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 21:30

In order to get a consensus between anti-federalists and federalist to be able to forward on the constitution, james madison advocated for a bill of rights. what was the purpose of the bill of rights for citizens of the united states?

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Which statement does not describe a cultural change that occurred in the 1920s...

Questions