Unlike the economy of the south in the 1850s, the north’s economy was based b. solely on industry c. on both agriculture and industry d. none of the above

C. on both agriculture and industry.

Explanation:

Prior to the Civil War, the economies of the North and the South were very different. In the case of the North, the economy was dependent both on agriculture and industry. This meant that they were better prepared to face the war, as industrial production could continue even if agriculture came to a cease. On the other hand, the South depended solely on agriculture. This placed it in a more precarious situation when it came to its economy throughout the war.

a memoir is the correct answer

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.