subject
History, 28.07.2019 23:20 oreonb11

Igo further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed constitution, but would even be dangerous. they would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. for why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do? quote by: alexander hamilton answer choices: a: hamilton is a federalist and reasons that adding a list of rights to the constitution would cause problems later. b: hamilton is a federalist and reasons that the constitution should not be ratified without a specific list of rights. c: hamilton is an anti-federalist and reasons that adding a list of rights to the constitution would cause problems later. d: hamilton is an anti-federalist and reasons that the constitution should not be ratified without a specific list of rights.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Pl ! the term laissez-faire refers to the government’s approach, in the 1890s, to foreign policy affecting trade. economic policy affecting business. educational policy affecting schools. domestic policy affecting social reform.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
What british actions lead to the creation of the constitution
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
Causes and effect chart for industrial revolution
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
The invasion of europe began in the country of ° france ° germany ° belgium
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Igo further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are conte...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722360