Which best explains how a historian synthesizes evidence to reach a conclusion

What are two reasons that president andrew jackson supported the state of georgia despite the court ruling against it in worcester v. georgia (1832)? he legit that expansion of us territory was more important he wanted to set an example for native american tribes in other states he thought that imposing federal power over a stated authority would increase political tensions he did not like native american culture and wanted to assimilate native americans he personally believed that native american tribes were not like foreign nations