Which of the following resulted from the dred scott decision? a. dred scott remained a slave. b. the fugitive slave law was declared unconstitutional. c. a slave was ruled to be a non-citizen with no right to sue in federal court. d. freeing a slave against his master's wishes was ruled to be a violation of due process of law. e. the missouri compromise was declared unconstitutional. f. proslavery people were alarmed. the u. s. constitution appeared to support slavery.

F. Proslavery people were alarmed.

T. Freeing a slave against his master's wishes was ruled to be a violation of due process of law.

T. The Missouri Compromise was declared unconstitutional.

T. Dred Scott remained a slave.

F. The fugitive slave law was declared unconstitutional.

T. The U.S. Constitution appeared to support slavery.

T. A slave was ruled to be a non-citizen with no right to sue in federal court.

Hope this helps!

the answer is a

explanation:

comparison is that they aren't nationalistic. a dif is that sds is government approved movemnet while yaf isnt \

it isnt that hard

explanation: