Which response displays best how responses to roosevelt corollary differed? question 33 options: us businessmen were , while latin americans were angered by us interference all of these europe was grateful to have an excuse to avoid latin america americans were angered by the roosevelt corollary

Responses to Roosevelt Corollary differed displays best as US businessmen were pleased, while Latin Americans were angered by U.S interference.

Option  A

Explanation:

“Roosevelt Corollary” act as an interference in crisis war between European and Latin American countries. Which reflected due to debt and support European countries gave to them , so in return they were trying to claim land properties & dominance in trade as also resulted by Venezuela Crisis of 1902-03.

Theodore Roosevelt 26th President of U.S.A was not comfortable with scenario and stated “Roosevelt Corollary” as addition to the Monroe Doctrine (US policy to oppose European Colonism) in 1904. This was done to shield Latin America from Europeans intervention, while strong military support was gained from British which was power house for taking actions.

Overall, Corollary resulted into huge export from Latin America to USA like bananas, cotton, cacao, nitrates, sugarcane, wool etc while USA manufacture goods and sell back to Latin American countries which leads big fall in their GDP. This way they get dependent on selling products to U.S, pleased US businessmen unknowingly hence they got ignited by U.S interference.

herodotus taught this. herodotus was an ancient greek historian who was born in halicarnassus in the persian empire. he is known for having written the book the histories, a detailed record of his "inquiry" on the origins of the greco-persian wars.

demand is the need and oportunity to buy a given good or service.