Read the passage. excerpt from "remarks on east-west relations at brandenburg gate in west berlin" by ronald regan but in the west today, we see a free world that has achieved a level of prosperity and well-being unprecedented in all human history. in the communist world, we see failure, technological backwardness, declining standards of health, even want of the most basic kind—too little food. even today, the soviet union still cannot feed itself. after these four decades, then, there stands before the entire world one great and inescapable conclusion: freedom leads to prosperity. freedom replaces the ancient hatreds among the nations with comity and peace. freedom is the victor. refer to explorations in literature for a complete version of this speech. which statement best describes the validity and sufficiency of reagan’s evidence? a: it is irrelevant and insufficient so it weakens his argument overall. b: it is relevant and sufficient evidence

After World War II, Germany was divided in two. The West side adopted Capitalism and followed the principles and ideals of the United States while the East side followed the path of the Soviet Union and Communism. After its division, the United States and the Soviet Union started something known as the Cold War, where each one wanted to prove their political system was the best.

Reagan's speech focus on evidence like the scarce of food and the declining standards of health in order to prove many the failures of the Communist administration. Thus, we can say his speech is:  relevant and sufficient evidence, option B.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

explanation:

i have ni idea