In the case of schenck v. united states the supreme court ruled that.. a. the espionage act was unconstitutional. b. charles schenck had been falsely accused. c. speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned. d. the first amendment had no limits.

C. speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned.

Explanation:

Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer were two socialists who circulated pamphlets urging disobedience through peaceful action from the public because they understood that the draft during World War I infringed the Thirteenth Amendment ban on involuntary servitude. They were convicted of violating the Espionage Act of 1917 by trying to create insubordination, and they appealed claiming that the Espionage Act violated the First Amendment. However, in Schenck v. United States (1919), the Court stated that it was a proper application of Congress’ wartime authority.

im not sure its either a leader of a group of congresspeople or a person from a congressmans district

sorry im not sure

b. they tried to evict the squatters from the area.

so sorry if wrong