Due process is a principle that is promised to u. s. citizens in the constitution. what is it? (select all that apply.) the concept of individual rights. the belief that rights cannot be taken away from individuals without proper legal steps. the concept stating that laws must be written to adhere to the constitution. the belief that all individuals have a right to a jury trial.

The belief that rights cannot be taken away from individuals without proper legal steps.

Explanation:

The Fourteenth Amendment in the US Constitution stated a series of individual rights such as Due Process.

The Due Process is based on fundamental fairness that addresses which legal procedures are required to be followed in state proceedings, like notice, opportunity for hearing, confrontation and cross-examination, discovery, basis of decision and others.

This means everybody have to follow the same legal rules and principles so that all individuals are treated fairly.

president jefferson protested this interference in american trade. he sent james monroe to london to negotiate a treaty. jefferson wanted britain to stop taking sailors from american ships, and to stop interfering in the trade of neutral nations. monroe tried many times to discuss such an agreement. but the british foreign minister was always too busy to see him.

explanation:

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is