subject
History, 01.08.2019 05:00 jkirby29

"it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. if two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each." —chief justice john marshall, 1803 which conclusion can be drawn from this excerpt of the supreme court's decision in marbury v. madison? a) the jurisdiction granted to the judicial branch is limited to federal and constitutional laws. b) this decision established the concept of judicial review and strengthened the role of the judicial branch. c) this decision gave congress the authority to charter the national bank, which angered the anti-federalists. d) this decision strengthened the "elastic clause" of the u. s. constitution and expanded the powers of congress.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 14:30
Summarize the effects of the marshall plan on the us and western european countries
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 17:30
What where the five beliefs of the french philosophers?
Answers: 3
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:30
What happened as agriculture became entrenched in the south ?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:20
What specific events led richard nixon to resign the presidency
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
"it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. those w...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722367